Tag: assassinations

  • MANUAL FOR SPOTTING A KNIFE

    By Jamie, not Cormac, McCarthy

    Manual for Spotting the Knife

    There’s enough rot in a regular person
    to fuel a thousand comment sections
    and still have leftovers for Sunday.

    You don’t need monsters.
    You just need people
    with slogans
    and something to protect.

    The loudest about mercy
    keep their hands clean
    by pointing.

    The loudest about love
    need an audience
    or it spoils.

    The loudest about peace
    sleep with one eye open
    and a thumb on the trigger
    they swear they don’t own.

    God-talkers rent God.
    They don’t live with Him.
    Peace-talkers rehearse it
    like a line they keep forgetting.
    Love-talkers mean approval
    and charge interest.

    Watch the ones with microphones.
    Watch the ones with certainty.
    Watch the ones who underline books
    but never bleed on the page.

    Watch the ones who romanticize hunger
    or mock it—
    both are tourists.

    Watch the fast clappers.
    They clap to hear themselves.

    Watch the ones who police language—
    they’re terrified
    something feral might get loose
    and name them.

    Watch the ones who need crowds.
    Alone, they evaporate.

    The average man isn’t harmless.
    The average woman isn’t gentle.
    Their love wants a receipt.
    Their love wants witnesses.
    Their love wants to be normal
    so it doesn’t have to be brave.

    And here’s the part nobody says out loud:

    There’s brilliance in their resentment.
    A precision.
    A teamwork.
    A choreography.

    They can’t stand silence
    because silence asks questions.
    They can’t stand solitude
    because it doesn’t applaud.

    They can’t make anything
    that didn’t already exist,
    so when they fail
    they blame the room,
    the time,
    the culture,
    the weather,
    you.

    They don’t understand art
    because art doesn’t ask permission.
    They don’t understand love
    because love doesn’t negotiate.

    So they’ll tell you
    you’re doing it wrong.
    That your grief is excessive.
    That your joy is suspicious.
    That your freedom is offensive.

    Then they’ll come for you
    not messy,
    not emotional—
    but clean.

    Their hatred is efficient.
    It shines.
    It passes inspections.
    It wears credentials.

    It doesn’t rage.zwzwq
    It executes.

    And that—
    that is the only masterpiece
    most of them will ever finish.

  • The Murder of Charlie Kirk

    The murder of Charlie Kirk is not merely an assassination — it is an x-ray of our species at its worst. We are confronted again with the spectacle of a coward mistaking a bullet for an argument. It does not take a man to kill. It takes only the cold blood and weak little veins of someone incapable of reason.

    A real man — a real woman — meets an opponent with intellect, with wit, with fire in the mind. Not with a rifle on a rooftop. Those who exalt this act reveal themselves not as revolutionaries, but as bottom-feeders: parasites gnawing at the body of civilization, dragging us down to a point where debate itself is murdered alongside its victims.

    This is not about politics or that our outrage wasn’t there when Melissa and Mark Hortman were killed in cold blood. It is about humanity itself, and whether we still deserve the word. If our instinct is to meet cowardice with more cowardice, to answer bullets with bullets, then perhaps we will have proven the assassin’s point — that the species is already finished.

    The real turning point is not that Charlie Kirk is dead, but whether we are capable of refusing the abyss that his murderer has opened.